WWW search Gensuikyo search

to english

@

THE STRATEGY OF TERROR

(By Major General Kostas Konstantinidis(Ret)-Greece)

I bring you greetings from Greece, the country that gave birth of the Olympic Games and from Athens, the city of hosting the modern Olympic Games in August, 2004. During the Olympic Games the Ancient Greeks had succeeded Peace, by instituting the Olympic Armistice that provided a stopping of all the wars three months before and three months after the Games. Now, after 2700 years the New World Order made the Games a military and police event.

Terrorizing the Olympic Games

The news from Athens is not good. The most peaceful and joyful global holiday-the Olympic Games- has been made a terrible demonstration of anti- terror paranoia. Actually, USA and NATO-due to their fear for a terrorist attack- made it a show of terror with the most sophisticated and costly spy-devises. (e.g cameras, infra red, zeppelin balloon, metal tracing machines, submarines cables, complex command and controls systems, systems for protection against biological and chemical war, the patrolling of the 6th fleet, NATO AWACS , armed NATO commandos, etc) So, the real winner of the Olympic Games is USA, NATO and the multi-national companies that made astronomical profit at the expenses of the Hellenic people. In the name of fear and threat, they killed the peaceful ideals of friendship and cooperation between all peoples that is the real spirit of the Olympic Games. A visible and invisible anti-terror net that has been spread upon the quiet city of Athens, that, we suspect, will remains after the Games in order to spy the citizens. The people are protesting, because they believe that all these excessive measures is the alibi to put in effect the undemocratic laws of the New World Order, that limit the human rights and pave the ground for their global Dictatorship.

Two Faces of the same Strategy

It is evident that after the collapse of the bipolar system the vicious center in Washington invented the Terrorism as an alternative enemy. Terror and anti-Terror are two faces of the same strategy. Al ? Qaeda is not a huge monster, stronger than the USA, as they present it. There is not serious evidence that actually exists such a terrorist organization. Even if it exists is probably a covert organ controlled by the Zionist-American Establishment. The Terror Strategy is acting with two branches: The State Terrorism(known as anti-terrorism) and the Organization Terrorism. Their real scope is to impose the undemocratic laws. The first victim was the American people that suffered human losses at 9/11 attack. Millions of people demonstrate in the big cities against the American occupation in Iraq, as well as the preparation for a new attack against Iran. Arch-terrorist is the American president-and the vicious circle behind him- that is using smart bombs, missiles against the uncombatant population, keeps people in Guantanamo and other prisons without trial, orders tortures for the prisoners, violates the Human Rights, imposes Patriot Acts and Anti-Terror Laws, intervenes in foreign countries without the legal permission of the Security Council of the U. N etc.

The Liars

According to the conclusions of the investigations in the USA and Britain: gMr. Bush and Blair are liarsh They made a war against Iraq without any evidence of mass destruction weapons. The American Administration has not tell the truth about the 9/11 attack against the World Trade Centre. If somebody knows about the plotting and does not react is surely a plotter and a conspirator. In the USA the front of non believers of the official acceptation for the 9/11 strike is broadened [Recent information show that the American government was familiar of the gterrorist plottingh and did not react to stop them. Why? So the first acceptation is true, that the 9/11 was made by the same mystic centres in order to develop better their Terror Strategy. In Spain did not exist suicide bombers? The only terrorist group that could be efficient to control the editorial group of gNew York Timesh is the N.O.S(Novus Ordo Seclorum) that is sponsored by the Wall Street M , is informed by the Bfnai Bfrith and from the corruptive military section of Special Forces in Tel Aviv]

The gmotherh of Crisis

Another point of major crisis is the Palestinian issue. In Europe everybody knows that the war in Palestine is not fed by the hostility between the two peoples, but from the continuation of the brutal Israeli occupation o Palestine, that lasts more than half a century. Dr. Ghandi said that gthere is not Peace without Justiceh They use their mass media in order to misinform and disorientate the pubic opinion about their big crimes against the humanity. Friedrich Nitze said that: gwhichever fights monster is threatened to become he a monsterh and gif you are looking for long at the abyss, then the abyss is looking at youh. At the present time USA has bring the world to the abyss of the gterrorh, by imposing world-wide the fear and insecurity and looking for more than half of a century at the Nuclear Weapons and the abyss of a nuclear war. However an incident like that can be happened any time : "MOSCOW - It was just past midnight as Stanislav Petrov settled into the commander's chair inside the secret bunker at Serpukhov-15, the installation where the Soviet Union monitored its early-warning satellites over the United States. Then the alarms went off. On the panel in front him was a red pulsating button. One word flashed: "Start." It was Sept. 26, 1983, and Petrov was playing a principal role in one of the most harrowing incidents of the nuclear age, a false alarm signalling a U.S. missile attack."

The Nightmarish Scenario
Since no one has ever experienced a massive nuclear attack, it seems natural to assume it will never happen. For many people, the idea of a nuclear attack is an abstraction - something so extreme and so
unrealistic that it seems it can happen only in motion pictures or in novels. Many people assume that world leaders would never be so irresponsible as to let an all-out nuclear war actually take place.
Little do they know . . ." Imagine the case that a 10-kiloton nuclear bomb (a pipsqueak in weapons terms) is smuggled into Manhattan and explodes at Grand Central. Some 500,000 people are killed, and the U.S. suffers $1 trillion in direct economic damage. That scenario, cited in a report last year from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard, could be a glimpse of our future. We urgently need to control nuclear materials to forestall that threat, but in this war on proliferation, we're now slipping backward. President Bush (after ignoring the issue before 9/11) now forcefully says the right things - but still doesn't do enough. "We're losing the war on proliferation," Andrew F. Krepinevich Jr., a military expert and executive director of the Centre for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, says bluntly. Until recently, nuclear trends looked encouraging. President Kennedy and others in the early 1960's expected dozens of countries to develop atomic weapons quickly, but in fact controls largely worked. Even now, only eight nations definitely possess nuclear weapons. The American president despite pretends that is against the mass destruction weapons, keeps silent for Israel, that has perhaps 200 nuclear weapons. Is Israel above the international laws?

Israel gUberallesh

Israel has warned that it is prepared to take unilateral military action against Iran if the international community fails to stop any development of nuclear weapons at the countryfs atomic energy facilities. Israel has told Washington it is prepared to act alone and launch a strike similar to its attack on Iraq in 1981 when its air force bombed a nuclear reactor near Baghdad. However it means a new war that can be developed with nuclear weapons. Israel also made the 9/11 attack in New York and Washington by using Arab terrorists in order to intervene the USA into the terrorist war. Their main purpose is to change the status quo in the Middle East and apply their gMaster Planh for the global domination] The only good news is that Libya abandoned its weapons
program. But all in all, the risks of a nuclear 9/11 are increasing. "I wouldn't be at all surprised if nuclear weapons are used over the next 15 or 20 years," said Bruce Blair, president of the Center for Defense Information, "first and foremost by a terrorist group that gets its hands on a Russian nuclear weapon or a Pakistani nuclear weapon."

My conclusion is that the same vicious center will use the nuclear terror in order to pass through their plotting plans

The Nuclear Programs of North Korea and Pakistan
Thanks to the ineptitude of hard-liners in Mr. Bush's administration, and their refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations, North Korea is going all-out to make warheads. It may have just made six new nuclear weapons. Then there is Iran, which has sought nuclear weapons since the days of the Shah, and whose nuclear program seems to have public support. Finally, there is the real grogueh nation of proliferation, Pakistan. We know that Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Islamist father of Pakistan's bomb, peddled materials to Libya and North Korea, and we don't know who else. "It may be that A. Q. Khan & Associates already have passed bomb-grade nuclear fuel to the Qaeda, and we are in for the worst," warns Paul Leventhal, founding president of the Nuclear Control Institute. I would say that the only solution to become the world safer is the broader region of the Middle East should be Nuclear Free Zone
Another puzzle is why the Bush Administration that spends hundreds of billions of dollars in Iraq doesn't try harder to secure uranium and plutonium in Russia and elsewhere. [The bipartisan program to secure weapons of mass destruction is starved for funds - but Mr. Bush is proposing a $41 million cut in "cooperative threat reduction" with Russia]

The gDirty Bombh

Unless the global community act more aggressively, it will get a wake-up call from a nuclear explosion or, more likely, a "dirty bomb" that uses radioactive materials routinely lying around hospitals and factories. To clarify the stakes, here's a scenario from the Federation of American Scientists for a modest terrorist incident:
gA stick of cobalt, an inch thick and a foot long, is taken from among
hundreds of such sticks at a food irradiation plant. It is blown up with
just 10 pounds of explosives in a "dirty bomb" at the lower tip of
Manhattan, with a one-mile-per-hour breeze blowing. Some 1,000 square
kilometers in three states is contaminated, and some areas of New York City become uninhabitable for decadesh

The American Nuclear Terror

All the nuclear programs of the grogueh countries are gtooth sticksh in front of the American huge nuclear programs such as:

1/ The gStar War Defenceh in a new edition

The US hawks have never forgotten the Star Wars. The scrapping of the anti-ballistic missile treaty was one of the Bush rearmament process and pushing for a Star Wars Defence. The supporters believe that is "illogical" to "stop research and development on a potential weapon that could destroy a terrorist group or prevent a grogueh nation from creating a chemical-biological capacity deep undergroundh. However the opponents expressed their worry that such nuclear weapons would eventually be used. [Sen. Edward M. Kennedy said: gIf we build them, we'll use themh and he warned gThose who pushed for an end to the ban on the low-yield weapons said they could target enemies more preciselyh]

2/ The gPenetratorh

A new dreadful weapon that the Americans are going to develop is the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator. It could explode with as much as 70 times the force of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, toward the end of World War II. The Senate agreed to continue research on the Penetrator, which could explode targets protected by rock or hardened surfaces. A comparable bill for a study of low-yield "mini nukes" was passed in the House. This project is very dangerous because will contribute to the further proliferation of nuclear weapons



Conclusions
Countries that do have nuclear weapons must stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons to more countries. The people should work against the very existence of nuclear weapons. As long as they exist, they put humankind at risk and they unavoidably cause proliferation to more countries. Nuclear abolition is the radical and intelligent solution to the proliferation problem. Contemplating and planning the use of nuclear weapons - as the nuclear Haves do - is the largest terrorist act of all. Just guess why no democracy has ever held a referendum on the issue of possessing nuclear weapons.

END

@

@

@

Page Top or Site Top